Branches are never irrelevant in git :), not really clear . I'm totally in agreement that we can implement CtR ...
but I just want to make sure that it's clear what model we are agreeing on. Because the power is in the unified and transparent workflow, not just the raw CtrR rule . > On Dec 27, 2014, at 1:30 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> wrote: > > Branches are irrelevant to how the we allow the commits to get in. > > Branches are needed for more complex features that require a collaborate > effort and/or prolonged development time. Does it make sense? > > Cos > >> On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 09:26AM, Jay Vyas wrote: >> If we wanna do CTR ... >> Can we just do it into master? >> I realize it will break but that what CI is for. >> >> I wanna make sure we aren't just creating a backlog of unmerged branches. >> >>> On Dec 26, 2014, at 4:23 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> +1 from me >>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> I've been reading this discussion on Ignite (incubating) dev@ list >>>> http://s.apache.org/wPA and it clicked with the thread we were having in >>>> the last few days around the community and development processes. >>>> >>>> What do you guys think if we'll try CTR model? Committers here went through >>>> the process of gaining their karma and proved with their contributions that >>>> they don't need peer-reviews for a lot of things that are coming into the >>>> project on the daily basis. The RTC is especially annoying for trivial >>>> changes >>>> and is really making things slower than they could've been. >>>> >>>> So, what do you think guys? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Take care, >>>> Cos >>>> 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 >>>> Cos' pubkey: http://people.apache.org/~cos/cos.asc >>>> >>>> ---- Wisdom of the hour ---- >>>> >>>> FORTUNE PROVIDES QUESTIONS FOR THE GREAT ANSWERS: #4 >>>> A: Go west, young man, go west! >>>> Q: What do wabbits do when they get tiwed of wunning awound? >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> >>> - Andy >>> >>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >>> (via Tom White)
