So, to wrap up the conversation: I see that overall attitude is positive towards the CTR approach, but it is hanging on the availability of the new CI.
Let's wait until the CI is ready and then I will start a formal [VOTE] on this. Thanks, cos On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 05:16PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > I've been reading this discussion on Ignite (incubating) dev@ list > http://s.apache.org/wPA and it clicked with the thread we were having in > the last few days around the community and development processes. > > What do you guys think if we'll try CTR model? Committers here went through > the process of gaining their karma and proved with their contributions that > they don't need peer-reviews for a lot of things that are coming into the > project on the daily basis. The RTC is especially annoying for trivial changes > and is really making things slower than they could've been. > > So, what do you think guys? > > -- > Take care, > Cos > 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 > Cos' pubkey: http://people.apache.org/~cos/cos.asc > > ---- Wisdom of the hour ---- > > FORTUNE PROVIDES QUESTIONS FOR THE GREAT ANSWERS: #4 > A: Go west, young man, go west! > Q: What do wabbits do when they get tiwed of wunning awound?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
