Reading that article the only conclusion I can reach (unless I'm misreading) is that all the stuff that was never free is still not free - the change is that Oracle may actually be interested in the fact that some are using non-free products for free.
Pretty much a non-story, it seems like. On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:55 PM, Kant Kodali <k...@peernova.com> wrote: > Looking at this http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/12/16/oracle_ > targets_java_users_non_compliance/?mt=1481919461669 I don't know why > Cassandra recommends Oracle JVM? > > JVM is a great piece of software but I would like to stay away from Oracle > as much as possible. Oracle is just horrible the way they are dealing with > Java in General. > > >
