On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:45 AM, Roger Hoover <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Ingmar,
>
> Did this ever get released?
>
<snip/>

Not as part of Commons SCXML yet, which is the bit I'm more aware of.

-Rahul


> Thanks,
>
> Roger
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Ingmar Kliche
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Hi Roger,
>> >
>> > yes, we have implemented it and plan to provide it to the project quite
>> > soon. But the licensing issue is a good point and should be clarified.
>> > Technically the implementation needs some final cleanup and things like
>> test
>> > cases. If you can wait another couple of weeks (due to holiday season) it
>> > should be available.
>> >
>> <snip/>
>>
>> Looking forward to it as well (that will reduce the min. JDK
>> requirement for using Rhino I presume).
>>
>> -Rahul
>>
>>
>>
>> > Regards,
>> > Ingmar.
>> >
>> > 2008/12/16 Roger Hoover <[email protected]>
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Has anyone implemented Javascript as an expression language in SCXML
>> Common
>> >> with Rhino?  Would there be licensing issues with SCXML under Apache
>> >> license
>> >> and Rhino under MPL/GPL/LGPL triple license?
>> >>
>> >> If it can't be done as part of this project, how hard would it be to
>> >> implement externally and do others have interest in it?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >>
>> >> Roger
>> >>
>> >
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to