Hi Roger, you are right - this is still an open issue. Sorry for the "delay". Beginning from May (this year ;-) I will have a (part time) intern and I will put him on this issue first. So there is good hope. If you can wait for another few days? Sorry again.
- Ingmar. 2009/4/24 Roger Hoover <[email protected]> > Hi Ingmar, > > Did this ever get released? > > Thanks, > > Roger > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Ingmar Kliche > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Roger, > > > > > > yes, we have implemented it and plan to provide it to the project quite > > > soon. But the licensing issue is a good point and should be clarified. > > > Technically the implementation needs some final cleanup and things like > > test > > > cases. If you can wait another couple of weeks (due to holiday season) > it > > > should be available. > > > > > <snip/> > > > > Looking forward to it as well (that will reduce the min. JDK > > requirement for using Rhino I presume). > > > > -Rahul > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > Ingmar. > > > > > > 2008/12/16 Roger Hoover <[email protected]> > > > > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> Has anyone implemented Javascript as an expression language in SCXML > > Common > > >> with Rhino? Would there be licensing issues with SCXML under Apache > > >> license > > >> and Rhino under MPL/GPL/LGPL triple license? > > >> > > >> If it can't be done as part of this project, how hard would it be to > > >> implement externally and do others have interest in it? > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> > > >> Roger > > >> > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > >
