On 28/01/2009, at 10:10 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:


On 28 Jan 2009, at 12:21, Antony Blakey wrote:

And furthermore, where's the community discussion about this? Where's the roadmap, the architectural discussion? Or are we all meant to stand back in awe of one person's god-like vision, unexplained, undiscussed, ineffable? That doesn't sound like an Apache project.

Easy now. CouchDB and the community is balancing making a make-your- own-cloud high performance multi-node database and a single-node- standalone-application database. There are forces that pull in one and others that pull in the, well, other direction. I think this is good.

My point isn't about this or any other specific technical issue.

This project seems to be administered in accordance with Damien's unexplained and undiscussed plan. That would be fine, except that this is an Apache project. I'm looking for a discussion of the plan, of the goals, of the future architecture, rather than merely being allowed to discuss some technical details as CouchDB is built according to some private vision.

Antony Blakey
-------------
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787

There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies.
  -- C. A. R. Hoare


Reply via email to