On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:24:33PM +1030, Antony Blakey wrote: > > On 28/01/2009, at 10:10 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > >> >> On 28 Jan 2009, at 12:21, Antony Blakey wrote: >> >>> And furthermore, where's the community discussion about this? >>> Where's the roadmap, the architectural discussion? Or are we all >>> meant to stand back in awe of one person's god-like vision, >>> unexplained, undiscussed, ineffable? That doesn't sound like an >>> Apache project. >> >> Easy now. CouchDB and the community is balancing making a make-your- >> own-cloud high performance multi-node database and a single-node- >> standalone-application database. There are forces that pull in one and >> others that pull in the, well, other direction. I think this is good. > > My point isn't about this or any other specific technical issue. > > This project seems to be administered in accordance with Damien's > unexplained and undiscussed plan. That would be fine, except that this > is an Apache project. I'm looking for a discussion of the plan, of the > goals, of the future architecture, rather than merely being allowed to > discuss some technical details as CouchDB is built according to some > private vision.
I think you're over-reacting, again. I find the way that you've framed this objectionable, and it offends me that you've made such wild accusations about the mismanagement of the PMC. It would really smooth the consensus building and community process if you were able to give us the benefit of the doubt. This whole sub-thread was a reaction to my off-the-cuff remark. Absurd. -- Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
