On Aug 7, 2010, at 1:21 AM, Sascha Reuter wrote: > Thats exactly what I reported 2 days ago! Bug is already opened and > databasefile was provided to the couchio guys! Running on Linux... >
Thanks, we're keenly interested in seeing what's going on here. Chris > Am 07.08.2010 um 06:37 schrieb J Chris Anderson <[email protected]>: > >> >> On Aug 6, 2010, at 9:02 PM, Yue Chuan Lim wrote: >> >>> Sorry to reply myself so quickly. >>> >>> Peeking inside the .couch file and searching for the documents I have >>> missing turn up results. Offhand I am noticing 4 instances of the string >>> gsc_test_03. Which is ID of the document I am missing. >>> >> >> You are on Windows? Perhaps this is an issue with the windows file handling. >> >> Can you comment on this bug, and also save those .couch files in case we >> need to analyze them? >> >> Corruption like this should be impossible, but this is the second case we've >> heard lately, so I'm guessing it is a Windows issue. >> >> Please comment on this bug with information about your machine enviroment >> (OS, Filesystem, Disk size, etc) >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-844 >> >> Thanks! >> >> Chris >> >> >> >>> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Yue Chuan Lim <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I have a set of documents that have been committed for more then a day, >>>> regularly read from without a problem. Had to stop the database service to >>>> do some debugging, used the couchdb.bat provided in CouchDB/bin for easy >>>> access to the log. And I noticed that I basically lost all the documents in >>>> question. >>>> >>>> There does not appear to be corruption per se, but it is as if my database >>>> just rolled back to the state it was in a few days ago, i.e. most of my >>>> documents are there but some old documents that I'm pretty sure I have >>>> deleted are back, and my newer documents are gone. >>>> >>>> Appears to have happened to me more then once, shrugged it off the last >>>> time as it might be just a mix up, but I am definite that my database has >>>> certainly rolled back this time. >>>> >>>> Is there any situation in which this might happen? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Yue Chuan >>>> >>
