On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 11:56, Randall Leeds <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree completely! I immediately thought of this because I wrote that > change. I spent a while staring at it last night but still can't > imagine how it's a problem. > > On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 11:12, Damien Katz <[email protected]> wrote: >> SVN commit r954043 looks suspicious. Digging further. >> >> -Damien >
I still want to stare at r954043, but it looks to me like there's at least one situation where we do not commit data correctly during compaction. This has to do with the way we now use the path to sync outside the couch_file:process. Check this diff: http://gist.github.com/513081
