On Aug 7, 2010, at 1:24 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > This sounds moderately serious. > > Would you like me to abort the current vote in leu of a fix?
I was planning to -1 the vote once we figure out what the deal is. There's a chance the bug only strikes in certain time zones (weird huh?) which might mean it's OK to continue the release. Chris > > On 7 Aug 2010, at 20:08, Randall Leeds wrote: > >> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 11:56, Randall Leeds <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I agree completely! I immediately thought of this because I wrote that >>> change. I spent a while staring at it last night but still can't >>> imagine how it's a problem. >>> >>> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 11:12, Damien Katz <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> SVN commit r954043 looks suspicious. Digging further. >>>> >>>> -Damien >>> >> >> I still want to stare at r954043, but it looks to me like there's at >> least one situation where we do not commit data correctly during >> compaction. This has to do with the way we now use the path to sync >> outside the couch_file:process. Check this diff: >> http://gist.github.com/513081 >
