Because reduce values are calculated at view build time, not query time, so you're basically asking the view to precompute every possible function's output.
B. On 17 July 2013 00:01, Stanley Iriele <[email protected]> wrote: > just curious, > > How feasable is it for there to be named reduce functions > and instead of reduce=true/false it could be reduce=<function name> > and keep everything like group levels the same. and the default for no > reduce being specified it could default to nothing ..like false. the only > Illegal name for a reduce function could be 'map'. > > right now I am just returning an object much like what _stats generates. I > was just curious why or why not this was a good sounding idea
