:)
On 17 July 2013 00:14, Stanley Iriele <[email protected]> wrote: > That sounds painful.... Thanks... I was just curious is all. Man Robert > you're really on top of these user issues... Someone should send you a > trophy of kind.... Maybe just a big red couch! > > On Jul 16, 2013 4:08 PM, "Robert Newson" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Because reduce values are calculated at view build time, not query >> time, so you're basically asking the view to precompute every possible >> function's output. >> >> B. >> >> >> On 17 July 2013 00:01, Stanley Iriele <[email protected]> > wrote: >> > just curious, >> > >> > How feasable is it for there to be named reduce functions >> > and instead of reduce=true/false it could be reduce=<function name> >> > and keep everything like group levels the same. and the default for no >> > reduce being specified it could default to nothing ..like false. the > only >> > Illegal name for a reduce function could be 'map'. >> > >> > right now I am just returning an object much like what _stats > generates. I >> > was just curious why or why not this was a good sounding idea
