That sounds painful.... Thanks... I was just curious is all. Man Robert you're really on top of these user issues... Someone should send you a trophy of kind.... Maybe just a big red couch!
On Jul 16, 2013 4:08 PM, "Robert Newson" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Because reduce values are calculated at view build time, not query > time, so you're basically asking the view to precompute every possible > function's output. > > B. > > > On 17 July 2013 00:01, Stanley Iriele <[email protected]> wrote: > > just curious, > > > > How feasable is it for there to be named reduce functions > > and instead of reduce=true/false it could be reduce=<function name> > > and keep everything like group levels the same. and the default for no > > reduce being specified it could default to nothing ..like false. the only > > Illegal name for a reduce function could be 'map'. > > > > right now I am just returning an object much like what _stats generates. I > > was just curious why or why not this was a good sounding idea
