On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Bryan Green <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am not sure the logo has to have the meaning be so obvious.  Looking at
> the world of other logos, it doesn't seem that meaning is that important to
> branding.  The two primary uses of a couch is to have people sit on it or
> lay on it.  I am not sure showing someone sprawled on a couch helps anyone
> make the connection to Relax anymore than the couch itself.
>

If we accept that meaning should not be read in a logo, then we can
just ignore that the pose means anything :-)

If we also accept that 'no publicity is bad publicity', then kicking
up a controversy like this can actually be good for CouchDB!

Cheers,
mano

-- 
Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
~ Pablo Picasso

Reply via email to