I actually like the current logo as is.
> On Oct 27, 2014, at 8:49 PM, Manokaran K <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Bryan Green <[email protected]> wrote: >> I am not sure the logo has to have the meaning be so obvious. Looking at >> the world of other logos, it doesn't seem that meaning is that important to >> branding. The two primary uses of a couch is to have people sit on it or >> lay on it. I am not sure showing someone sprawled on a couch helps anyone >> make the connection to Relax anymore than the couch itself. > > If we accept that meaning should not be read in a logo, then we can > just ignore that the pose means anything :-) > > If we also accept that 'no publicity is bad publicity', then kicking > up a controversy like this can actually be good for CouchDB! > > Cheers, > mano > > -- > Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. > ~ Pablo Picasso
