I was working off of the comments in the local.ini, which suggest using {couch_httpd, start_link, [https]}
But your explanation makes it obvious. Thanks. On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 4:00 PM Robert Samuel Newson <rnew...@apache.org> wrote: > A common mistake is to use couch_httpd instead of chttpd when configuring > the httpsd daemon. > > This; > {couch_httpd, start_link, [https]} > > will configure a new SSL-enabled listener equivalent to :5986, the > node-local port. This port should not bound to anything but 127.0.0.1, so > SSL-enabling it makes little sense. > > This; > {chttpd, start_link, [https]} > > > will configure a new SSL-enabled listener equivalent to :5984. This is > what you want. > > B. > > > On 13 Oct 2016, at 20:34, Timothy McKernan <timbitsandby...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > In my last post you told me (and the docs have always been clear in this > > regard) to use port 5984 on my single node, 2.0.0 build. > > > > If I use Fauxton to complete the single-node setup it asks for "Port that > > the Node uses" and defaults to 5984. So far this is all fine. > > > > I'm using ssl nearly exclusively. It's a requirement for me. The only > place > > I haven't used it is in using the _setup_cluster endpoint and to test > > single node setup using Fauxton. > > > > If I next PUT a db over SSL/6984 it will only be accessible via ports > > 6984/5986, so the SSL daemon appears to be serving the node, not the > > cluster. > > > > Is this intentional? Or did I do something wrong? > >