To see if batch processing is the culprit, please check by running an individual record through a process after restarting that process. If the records are identified, then it would be a problem of batch processing.
Thanks, Kim Ebert 1.801.669.7342 Perfect Search Corp http://www.perfectsearchcorp.com/ On 04/15/2013 02:27 PM, Deepal Dhariwal wrote: > Also I found that in few records canonical forms of words were not > annotated. For instance diabetes mellitus is recognized as a clinical > concept , however diabetic is not recognized. Similarly > catheterrization is annotated as medical concept however catheterized > is not considered valid. > > Attached herewith are screenshots for the same. Kindly let me know is > this also related to batch processing or is this a limitation of > cTAKES Aggregate UMLS Document Processor. > > Thanks > Deepal Dhariwal > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Deepal Dhariwal > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hello Kim, > > Yeah when I processed record individually blood pressure was > annotated as a medical concept. Can you kindly explain the reason > behind this difference in behavior. > > Thanks so much. > > Regards > Deepal Dhariwal > > > > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Kim Ebert > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi Deepal, > > Trying running the records individually and see if it > identifies the terms correctly; if so I may have an idea of > the problem. > > Thanks, > > Kim Ebert > 1.801.669.7342 <tel:1.801.669.7342> > Perfect Search Corp > http://www.perfectsearchcorp.com/ > > On 04/15/2013 01:36 PM, Deepal Dhariwal wrote: >> Hello Kim, >> >> The records were processed in a batch using UIMA Collection >> processing Engine. >> The parameters for UIMA CPE were as follows: >> Descriptor: UIMA File System Collection Reader >> Analysis Engine: cTAKES Aggregate UMLS Plaintext Processor >> CAS Consumer: XMI Writer CAS Consumer >> >> Thanks >> Deepal Dhariwal >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Kim Ebert >> <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hi Deepal, >> >> Was either record processed in a batch of records? Or >> where they >> processed as individual records? >> >> Kim Ebert >> 1.801.669.7342 <tel:1.801.669.7342> >> Perfect Search Corp >> http://www.perfectsearchcorp.com/ >> >> On 04/15/2013 12:49 PM, Deepal Dhariwal wrote: >> > Hello all, >> > >> > I have 2 medical records with the following content: >> > >> > Record 1 : >> > He went to the hospital Emergency Room where his blood >> pressure was >> > 120 / 80 , heart rate 94. >> > >> > Record 2: >> > Weight 197 lbs, up to 6 lbs, blood pressure 128/88, >> heart rate 70 . >> > >> > In the first record blood pressure is getting annotated >> as a Clinical >> > Entity Mention and a Medical Concept while in second >> record blood >> > pressure is not getting annotated as a clinical entity. >> > >> > Could someone shed some light on why the difference in >> behavior ? I >> > have attached the screenshots for reference. >> > >> > Regards >> > Deepal Dhariwal >> >> > > >
