Hmm that shouldnt really matter in these cases so long as the runs were consistent wrt ordering
On Monday, April 15, 2013, Savova, Guergana wrote: > Please, check whether you are running the LVG before the named entity > recognition module. **** > > --Guergana**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Deepal Dhariwal [mailto:[email protected]<javascript:_e({}, > 'cvml', '[email protected]');>] > > *Sent:* Monday, April 15, 2013 5:16 PM > *To:* Kim Ebert > *Cc:* [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]');>; > [email protected]<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]');> > *Subject:* Re: Regarding inconsistency in UMLS Dictionary Lookup Annotator > **** > > ** ** > > Also I found that in few records canonical forms of words were not > annotated. For instance diabetes mellitus is recognized as a clinical > concept , however diabetic is not recognized. Similarly catheterrization is > annotated as medical concept however catheterized is not considered valid. > **** > > ** ** > > Attached herewith are screenshots for the same. Kindly let me know is this > also related to batch processing or is this a limitation of cTAKES > Aggregate UMLS Document Processor.**** > > ** ** > > Thanks**** > > Deepal Dhariwal**** > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Deepal Dhariwal <[email protected]> > wrote:**** > > Hello Kim,**** > > ** ** > > Yeah when I processed record individually blood pressure was annotated as > a medical concept. Can you kindly explain the reason behind this difference > in behavior.**** > > ** ** > > Thanks so much.**** > > ** ** > > Regards**** > > Deepal Dhariwal**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Kim Ebert < > [email protected]> wrote:**** > > Hi Deepal, > > Trying running the records individually and see if it identifies the terms > correctly; if so I may have an idea of the problem. > > Thanks,**** > > > > **** > > Kim Ebert**** > > 1.801.669.7342**** > > Perfect Search Corp**** > > http://www.perfectsearchcorp.com/**** > > On 04/15/2013 01:36 PM, Deepal Dhariwal wrote:**** > > Hello Kim,**** > > ** ** > > The records were processed in a batch using UIMA Collection processing > Engine. **** > > The parameters for UIMA CPE were as follows:**** > > Descriptor: UIMA File System Collection Reader**** > > Analysis Engine: cTAKES Aggregate UMLS Plaintext Processor**** > > CAS Consumer: XMI Writer CAS Consumer**** > > ** ** > > Thanks**** > > Deepal Dhariwal**** > > ** ** > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Kim Ebert < > [email protected]> wrote:**** > > Hi Deepal, > > Was either record processed in a batch of records? Or where they > processed as individual records? > > Kim Ebert > 1.801.669.7342 > Perfect Search Corp > http://www.perfectsearchcorp.com/**** > > > On 04/15/2013 12:49 PM, Deepal Dhariwal wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I have 2 medical records with the following content: > > > > Record 1 : > > He went to the hospital Emergency Room where his blood pressure was > > 120 / 80 , heart rate 94. > > > > Record 2: > > Weight 197 lbs, up to 6 lbs, blood pressure 128/88, heart rate 70 . > > > > In the first record blood pressure is getting annotated as a Clinical > > Entity Mention and a Medical Concept while in second record blood > > pressure is not getting annotated as a clinical entity. > > > > Could someone shed some light on why the difference in behavior ? I > > have attached the screenshots for reference. > > > > Regards > > Deepal Dhariwal**** > > ** ** > > -- Sent from Gmail Mobile
