Hi!

I am not sure that I understand the question. What memory between
supersteps are you referring to?

If you mean that the same instances of the functions are used across all
supersteps and that their variables are kept: yes, you can rely on that.

Stephan
 Am 15.10.2014 17:09 schrieb "Attila Bernáth" <[email protected]>:

> Dear All,
>
> I am using the spargel API. I found that the VertexUpdateFunction
> class has memory between the supersteps. Is it safe to rely on this
> memory?
>
> Attila
>

Reply via email to