So I thought I can use this fact to remember something about these nodes.
2014-10-16 11:25 GMT+02:00 Stephan Ewen <[email protected]>: > Yes, that is guaranteed. > > Am 16.10.2014 10:23 schrieb "Attila Bernáth" <[email protected]>: > >> For example: an instance of the vertexupdatefunction processes certain >> vertices in one superstep (in its updateVertex method). Can I assume >> that it will process the same vertices in the next superstep, too? >> >> Attila >> >> 2014-10-16 1:34 GMT+02:00 Stephan Ewen <[email protected]>: >> > Hi! >> > >> > I am not sure that I understand the question. What memory between >> > supersteps >> > are you referring to? >> > >> > If you mean that the same instances of the functions are used across all >> > supersteps and that their variables are kept: yes, you can rely on that. >> > >> > Stephan >> > >> > Am 15.10.2014 17:09 schrieb "Attila Bernáth" <[email protected]>: >> > >> >> Dear All, >> >> >> >> I am using the spargel API. I found that the VertexUpdateFunction >> >> class has memory between the supersteps. Is it safe to rely on this >> >> memory? >> >> >> >> Attila
