Yes, that is guaranteed. Am 16.10.2014 10:23 schrieb "Attila Bernáth" <[email protected]>:
> For example: an instance of the vertexupdatefunction processes certain > vertices in one superstep (in its updateVertex method). Can I assume > that it will process the same vertices in the next superstep, too? > > Attila > > 2014-10-16 1:34 GMT+02:00 Stephan Ewen <[email protected]>: > > Hi! > > > > I am not sure that I understand the question. What memory between > supersteps > > are you referring to? > > > > If you mean that the same instances of the functions are used across all > > supersteps and that their variables are kept: yes, you can rely on that. > > > > Stephan > > > > Am 15.10.2014 17:09 schrieb "Attila Bernáth" <[email protected]>: > > > >> Dear All, > >> > >> I am using the spargel API. I found that the VertexUpdateFunction > >> class has memory between the supersteps. Is it safe to rely on this > >> memory? > >> > >> Attila >
