Regarding *Spring*, not really too differently actually, see here <https://github.com/jxblum/contacts-application/blob/master/configuration-example/src/main/resources/spring-server-cache.xml#L24-L33> [1] (XML) and here <https://github.com/jxblum/contacts-application/blob/master/configuration-example/src/main/java/example/app/spring/java/server/JavaConfiguredGeodeServerApplication.java#L66-L84> [2] (*JavaConfig*) (followed by this <https://github.com/jxblum/contacts-application/blob/master/configuration-example/src/main/java/example/app/spring/java/server/JavaConfiguredGeodeServerApplication.java#L91> [3] and this <https://github.com/jxblum/contacts-application/blob/master/configuration-example/src/main/java/example/app/spring/java/server/JavaConfiguredGeodeServerApplication.java#L96> [4]).
There is even an Annotation-based approach <https://github.com/jxblum/contacts-application/blob/master/configuration-example/src/main/java/example/app/spring/annotation/server/AnnotationConfiguredGeodeServerApplication.java> [5] for the curious onlooker. [1] https://github.com/jxblum/contacts-application/blob/master/configuration-example/src/main/resources/spring-server-cache.xml#L24-L33 [2] https://github.com/jxblum/contacts-application/blob/master/configuration-example/src/main/java/example/app/spring/java/server/JavaConfiguredGeodeServerApplication.java#L66-L84 [3] https://github.com/jxblum/contacts-application/blob/master/configuration-example/src/main/java/example/app/spring/java/server/JavaConfiguredGeodeServerApplication.java#L91 [4] https://github.com/jxblum/contacts-application/blob/master/configuration-example/src/main/java/example/app/spring/java/server/JavaConfiguredGeodeServerApplication.java#L96 [5] https://github.com/jxblum/contacts-application/blob/master/configuration-example/src/main/java/example/app/spring/annotation/server/AnnotationConfiguredGeodeServerApplication.java On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Bruce Schuchardt <bschucha...@pivotal.io> wrote: > The setting merely causes Geode to encrypt packets sent over UDP. > > > On 4/11/18 10:29 AM, Thacker, Dharam wrote: > >> >> Would there be any negative impact on disabling 'security-udp-dhalgo' on >> peer to peer members or pulse or jmx notifications ? >> >> Thanks, >> Dharam >> >> > -- -John john.blum10101 (skype)
