Regarding *Spring*, not really too differently actually, see here
<https://github.com/jxblum/contacts-application/blob/master/configuration-example/src/main/resources/spring-server-cache.xml#L24-L33>
[1]
(XML) and here
<https://github.com/jxblum/contacts-application/blob/master/configuration-example/src/main/java/example/app/spring/java/server/JavaConfiguredGeodeServerApplication.java#L66-L84>
[2]
(*JavaConfig*) (followed by this
<https://github.com/jxblum/contacts-application/blob/master/configuration-example/src/main/java/example/app/spring/java/server/JavaConfiguredGeodeServerApplication.java#L91>
[3]
and this
<https://github.com/jxblum/contacts-application/blob/master/configuration-example/src/main/java/example/app/spring/java/server/JavaConfiguredGeodeServerApplication.java#L96>
 [4]).

There is even an Annotation-based approach
<https://github.com/jxblum/contacts-application/blob/master/configuration-example/src/main/java/example/app/spring/annotation/server/AnnotationConfiguredGeodeServerApplication.java>
[5]
for the curious onlooker.


[1]
https://github.com/jxblum/contacts-application/blob/master/configuration-example/src/main/resources/spring-server-cache.xml#L24-L33
[2]
https://github.com/jxblum/contacts-application/blob/master/configuration-example/src/main/java/example/app/spring/java/server/JavaConfiguredGeodeServerApplication.java#L66-L84
[3]
https://github.com/jxblum/contacts-application/blob/master/configuration-example/src/main/java/example/app/spring/java/server/JavaConfiguredGeodeServerApplication.java#L91
[4]
https://github.com/jxblum/contacts-application/blob/master/configuration-example/src/main/java/example/app/spring/java/server/JavaConfiguredGeodeServerApplication.java#L96
[5]
https://github.com/jxblum/contacts-application/blob/master/configuration-example/src/main/java/example/app/spring/annotation/server/AnnotationConfiguredGeodeServerApplication.java


On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Bruce Schuchardt <bschucha...@pivotal.io>
wrote:

> The setting merely causes Geode to encrypt packets sent over UDP.
>
>
> On 4/11/18 10:29 AM, Thacker, Dharam wrote:
>
>>
>> Would there be any negative impact on disabling 'security-udp-dhalgo' on
>> peer to peer members or pulse or jmx notifications ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dharam
>>
>>
>


-- 
-John
john.blum10101 (skype)

Reply via email to