Manoj,
We may have exhausted our ability to help. As Stefan has pointed out
there have been a number of suggestions and explanations around the
issue you raise; it could be useful if you were to pursue those in the
first instance.
One thing that strikes me from your latest post is that you're
introducing too many variables when attempting to compare systems. If
you want to make comparisons then you should start with as identical a
system as possible and change just *one* parameter first. In this way
you will generally be a lot clearer around what changes have an affect
on something.
To be specific. You say MSRDWC uses a lot less bandwidth than Guacamole,
however (if I understand correctly) from what you say you're using
Guacamole with a Xrdp client machine, and MSRDWC with a MSRD client
machine. I suggest you should first test with Guacamole to the MSRD
client, and then MSRDWC to the *same* client with the *same* parameters
and the *same* series of tests. IOW the *only* change in the lineup is
MSRDWC vs Guacamole - NOT the client machine as well.
Moving on from this, I don't have access to MSRDWC and have never used
it but if possible the next test might be to utilise it with an Xrdp
client machine and compare that with Guacamole to the *same* client.
Such logical steps would lend much more credence to your results, and
may provide a clearer pointer to you as to where the issue, if there is
one, lays.
On 9/03/2020 8:58 p.m., Manoj Patil wrote:
Dear,
Any Resolution on my Issues.
Please suggest any changes at guacamole server and Xrdp host server.
On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 13:22, Manoj Patil <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Dear
ivanmarcus/mike,
The MSRDP setup is done at my end for testing purpose with same
user ,same screen,same depth etc. we measure the bandith for
singile session and it is too low. i am already sharing a snapshot
in preious mail.
*My point is if i used MSRDP web client to acees the server it
take low bandwidth utilization . when i am using guacd with xrdp
it uses high bandwidth.*
*
*
*
*
