Hi, Similar situation, I have an application that authenticates the user, the a connection ID and "build" the URL with the token that is where the user goes. The IP that appears on the log is the address of the server where the intermediate application is.
Any suggestions? Thanks *Manel Molina* *[email protected] <[email protected]>* *Dirección de Ciberseguridad* Ciutat de L’Aigua (D38) Paseo de la Zona Franca, 48 08038 Barcelona / España www.veolia.com <https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fprotect2.fireeye.com%2Fv1%2Furl%3Fk%3D31323334-501d5122-31356fd6-454445555731-a8425f343e5c4fad%26q%3D1%26e%3D30530535-2971-48a4-8441-12c02ea4dc09%26u%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Feur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com%252F%253Furl%253Dhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.veolia.com%25252F%2526data%253D05%25257C01%25257Csergi.carmona%252540agbar.es%25257C4c93dad3808642dd7ec308da3ccb99ab%25257Cf4a12867922d4b9dbb859ee7898512a0%25257C0%25257C0%25257C637889142388029142%25257CUnknown%25257CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%25253D%25257C3000%25257C%25257C%25257C%2526sdata%253DJJM7r2MgHUaiuJD%25252Bk2xlr3opNEFsJkp%25252Byh2MJq0XRS0%25253D%2526reserved%253D0&data=05%7C01%7Coriol.val%40agbar.es%7C8a3587bd93134628cf9908da4d2baf8e%7Cf4a12867922d4b9dbb859ee7898512a0%7C0%7C0%7C637907147446774859%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=5Vjff2WWXgkB77AldZ5g116HPKmbRv1h5PRjQjH9k0o%3D&reserved=0> El jue, 18 abr 2024 a las 15:50, Nick Couchman (<[email protected]>) escribió: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 8:24 AM Stephan von Krawczynski < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> I have a setup of guacamole where the user authentication is done by ldap >> (openldap slapd). Is there an easy way to hand the client IP over to ldap >> bind >> requests? >> >> > Maybe you can provide a little more detail on what you're trying to > accomplish? I'm sure it's possible, but probably not without modifications > to the code. Also, it'd be interesting to know why this is a desired or > required configuration? > > -Nick >
