On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 5:18 PM Ivanmarcus <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Stephan,
>
> Having been around here for a while I'd be very surprised to find code
> contributions simply 'ignored'. If you look at Guacamole's development
> history I think you'd see that contributions are welcomed, and where
> they address a need and/or fit the project well they are incorporated.
>
> Naturally there would be discussion, and it *may* be that some
> contributions are not [immediately] accepted, however they would not be
> discarded out of hand for no reason. Perhaps this has been your
> experience of other projects but please don't anticipate it here.
>
>
Yes, completely agree. There is definitely scrutiny of changes and
discussion around it, and a rather robust review process. So, while changes
will not be discarded out of hand, for no reason, they will also not be
blindly accepted.


> Otherwise it's my view (and clearly that of many others) that Guacamole
> is not a 'mediocre' product. It has its flaws and no doubt could be
> improved, but being derogatory about something is not especially
> productive and rarely a good way to effect change.
>
> Thus I wonder if you might spend a little time looking closely at
> Guacamole's development and how/why it works the way it does presently?
> As an active project with good interaction and hard working developers,
> input from experienced coders would be gratefully received. However I
> suggest the usual way to go about changing something is first to become
> involved, become 'known' by your contributions, to gain better knowledge
> of the issues and direction facing the project, and thence be able to
> effect positive and cohesive change...
>
>
+1

I would love to see the community of active contributors, both developers
and supporters on the mailing list, grow to include a greater number and
more diverse population.

-Nick

Reply via email to