On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Kok Hooi Chew <chewkokh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All, > Hey Kok Hooi, > Upgraded to 0.9.11, even though the reverse vnc feels more responsive > Great! I'd be interested to hear whether things are further improved with recent changes on master. There are changes related to the experimental X.Org driver development ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-168) which have been merged that have performance implications. but still having the issues occasionally the screen is not being updated > > The fact that a connection is normal VNC vs. reverse VNC is pretty opaque to Guacamole's VNC client, with much of the difference abstracted away by the library we use which actually implements the VNC protocol (libvncclient). There is a difference in the way the connection is initially established, but other than that the functions, etc. invoked/provided for the remainder of the session are identical. I would lean toward there possibly being a bug in the handling of reverse VNC in libvncclient, but testing that would require using some other VNC client which also uses libvncclient. I believe Remmina uses libvncclient as well. Could you see if the same problem occurs there? (Assuming that your distribution shows a dependency on libvncclient for the remmina package or its VNC plugin ... if not then this test may be useless...) Thanks, - Mike
