Hi All,
I've configured both the Guacamole and Remmina in the same ubuntu server
running the same libvncclient. I'm still having the issue where screen not
updated or mouse cursor missing when using Guacamole, but not when using
Remmina.

Any idea?

Thanks

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Kok Hooi Chew <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Mike
> Thanks a lot for the suggestion. will get back to you once i've done on
> the testing you suggested
>
> Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Mike Jumper <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Friday, March 17, 2017 9:43:19 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: ReverseVNC issue
>
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Kok Hooi Chew <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>
> Hey Kok Hooi,
>
>
>> Upgraded to 0.9.11, even though the reverse vnc feels more responsive
>>
>
> Great! I'd be interested to hear whether things are further improved with
> recent changes on master. There are changes related to the experimental
> X.Org driver development (https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-168) which have been merged that have performance
> implications.
>
> but still having the issues occasionally the screen is not being updated
>>
>>
> The fact that a connection is normal VNC vs. reverse VNC is pretty opaque
> to Guacamole's VNC client, with much of the difference abstracted away by
> the library we use which actually implements the VNC protocol
> (libvncclient). There is a difference in the way the connection is
> initially established, but other than that the functions, etc.
> invoked/provided for the remainder of the session are identical. I would
> lean toward there possibly being a bug in the handling of reverse VNC in
> libvncclient, but testing that would require using some other VNC client
> which also uses libvncclient.
>
> I believe Remmina uses libvncclient as well. Could you see if the same
> problem occurs there? (Assuming that your distribution shows a dependency
> on libvncclient for the remmina package or its VNC plugin ... if not then
> this test may be useless...)
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Mike
>
>

Reply via email to