If we're extending the vote I can find time to verify if running against 2.2 after using our default build fails. So long as running works, I think we can just release note the build problem for now.
If running fails I'd vote for sinking, given how easy a fix is. -- Sean On May 5, 2015 4:17 PM, "Nick Dimiduk" <[email protected]> wrote: > So what's the conclusion here? Are we dropping 2.2 support or updating the > poms and sinking the RC? > > On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > We could patch our POMs to reference the hadoop-minikdc artifact > > > independently of the rest of the Hadoop packages. It's standalone and > > > rarely changes. > > > > > > > > > > > +1. I've been using HBase to test Hadoop changes for isolating > dependencies > > from downstream folks (HADOOP-11804), and I've just been leaving the > > hadoop-minikdc artifact as-is due to these very reasons. > > > > -- > > Sean > > >
