I prefer to patch the POMs.
> On May 5, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> wrote: > > So what's the conclusion here? Are we dropping 2.2 support or updating the > poms and sinking the RC? > >> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> We could patch our POMs to reference the hadoop-minikdc artifact >>> independently of the rest of the Hadoop packages. It's standalone and >>> rarely changes. >> +1. I've been using HBase to test Hadoop changes for isolating dependencies >> from downstream folks (HADOOP-11804), and I've just been leaving the >> hadoop-minikdc artifact as-is due to these very reasons. >> >> -- >> Sean >>
