Formally, -0 Given tomorrow is hbasecon perhaps it would be better to spin a RC on Friday?
I can take HBASE-13637 but am sitting on a plane at the moment. Won't be able to get to it until tonight. > On May 6, 2015, at 10:43 AM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I prefer to patch the POMs. > > Is this a formal -1? > > I've opened HBASE-13637 for tracking this issue. Let's get it fixed and > I'll spin a new RC tonight. > >>> On May 5, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> So what's the conclusion here? Are we dropping 2.2 support or updating >> the >>> poms and sinking the RC? >>> >>>> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> We could patch our POMs to reference the hadoop-minikdc artifact >>>>> independently of the rest of the Hadoop packages. It's standalone and >>>>> rarely changes. >>>> +1. I've been using HBase to test Hadoop changes for isolating >> dependencies >>>> from downstream folks (HADOOP-11804), and I've just been leaving the >>>> hadoop-minikdc artifact as-is due to these very reasons. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sean >>
