-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 What happens if you contribute twice to the service point outside of the service point definition?
Johan James Carman wrote: > In my test case for multiple method interceptors, I use multiple like this: > > <module id="hivemind.lib.test" version="1.0.0"> > > <service-point id="FortuneCookie" > interface="org.apache.hivemind.lib.impl.FortuneCookie"> > <create-instance > class="org.apache.hivemind.lib.impl.FortuneCookieImpl"/> > <interceptor service-id="hivemind.lib.MethodInterceptorFactory" > name="first"> > <impl > object="instance:org.apache.hivemind.lib.impl.SuffixMethodInterceptor" /> > </interceptor> > <interceptor service-id="hivemind.lib.MethodInterceptorFactory" > name="second"> > <impl > object="instance:org.apache.hivemind.lib.impl.SuffixMethodInterceptor" /> > </interceptor> > </service-point> > > </module> > > -----Original Message----- > From: Johan Lindquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 9:22 AM > To: user@hivemind.apache.org > Subject: MethodInterceptorFactory and multiple interceptors > > Hi All, > > I have recently been using the MethodInterceptorFactory to create > interceptors based on the AOP Alliance libraries. > > Now, it is all fine until I realised that I can not have two different > interceptors (using the MethodInterceptorFactory service id) added to > the same service point. > > This would make sense if you for example referred to the logging > interceptor - two of it would be kinda dum. But since the > MethodInterceptorFactory is simply providing the plumbing for the real > implementation, 2 or more of this particular contribution should be fine > right? > > Not sure if this is an easy problem to solve or not? > > Cheers, > > johan > - -- you too? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEvj9M1Tv8wj7aQ34RArZiAJsGllZwd5FgwABxjAGU7OJRKathuQCdHoNZ S6bhZkekFEjAfCrOphjtI0E= =O2B6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
