-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Somewhat simplified :)
<implementation service-id="com.acme.Service">
<interceptor name="webservice1" after="jms1"
service-id="hivemind.lib.MethodInterceptorFactory">
<impl object="service:WebServiceMethodInterceptor" />
</interceptor>
</implementation>
Also tried fully qualified:
<implementation service-id="com.acme.Service">
<interceptor name="webservice1" after="integration.jms.jms1"
service-id="hivemind.lib.MethodInterceptorFactory">
<impl object="service:WebServiceMethodInterceptor" />
</interceptor>
</implementation>
Same error with both.
Johan
James Carman wrote:
> What syntax are you using in the hivemodule-webservice.xml file?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Johan Lindquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 10:30 AM
> To: user@hivemind.apache.org
> Subject: Re: MethodInterceptorFactory and multiple interceptors
>
> Ok, i tried the name attribute - does this require a fully qualified
> name or something?
>
> Currently getting the following error:
>
> 2006-07-19 16:28:21,919 ERROR com.acme.Service1 [error] Error at
> file:/home/johan/forge/projects/integration/target/test-classes/META-INF/hiv
> emodule-webservice.xml,
> line 61, column 121: Unknown interceptor contribution dependency
> 'integration.jms.jms7' (for 'integration.webservice.webservice7').
>
> Cheers,
>
> Johan
>
> James Carman wrote:
>>> To be honest, that "name" attribute could be documented a bit better,
>>> especially with respect to this factory.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Johan Lindquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 10:19 AM
>>> To: user@hivemind.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: MethodInterceptorFactory and multiple interceptors
>>>
>>> What happens if you contribute twice to the service point outside of the
>>> service point definition?
>>>
>>> Johan
>>>
>>> James Carman wrote:
>>>>> In my test case for multiple method interceptors, I use multiple like
>>> this:
>>>>> <module id="hivemind.lib.test" version="1.0.0">
>>>>>
>>>>> <service-point id="FortuneCookie"
>>>>> interface="org.apache.hivemind.lib.impl.FortuneCookie">
>>>>> <create-instance
>>>>> class="org.apache.hivemind.lib.impl.FortuneCookieImpl"/>
>>>>> <interceptor service-id="hivemind.lib.MethodInterceptorFactory"
>>>>> name="first">
>>>>> <impl
>>>>> object="instance:org.apache.hivemind.lib.impl.SuffixMethodInterceptor"
> />
>>>>> </interceptor>
>>>>> <interceptor service-id="hivemind.lib.MethodInterceptorFactory"
>>>>> name="second">
>>>>> <impl
>>>>> object="instance:org.apache.hivemind.lib.impl.SuffixMethodInterceptor"
> />
>>>>> </interceptor>
>>>>> </service-point>
>>>>>
>>>>> </module>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Johan Lindquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 9:22 AM
>>>>> To: user@hivemind.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: MethodInterceptorFactory and multiple interceptors
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have recently been using the MethodInterceptorFactory to create
>>>>> interceptors based on the AOP Alliance libraries.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now, it is all fine until I realised that I can not have two different
>>>>> interceptors (using the MethodInterceptorFactory service id) added to
>>>>> the same service point.
>>>>>
>>>>> This would make sense if you for example referred to the logging
>>>>> interceptor - two of it would be kinda dum. But since the
>>>>> MethodInterceptorFactory is simply providing the plumbing for the real
>>>>> implementation, 2 or more of this particular contribution should be fine
>>>>> right?
>>>>>
>>>>> Not sure if this is an easy problem to solve or not?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> johan
>>>>>
>>> --
>>> you too?
>
> --
> you too?
- --
you too?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEvkSU1Tv8wj7aQ34RAnf4AJ4rgrwevezgBYIkOSVB6mHGpW7FcwCfbUyZ
wcSsA1SR11zE/OEl2vOSZ88=
=QBzi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
