-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Interestingly enough - if I remove the after="name", then it works ...
But when I test this in the HiveMind src with the after attribute, it also works. Must be a version problem now ... Anyway, it seems to work for the moment - thanks for the help. Johan Johan Lindquist wrote: > Doesn't seem to make a difference - will continue the chase ... > > Johan > > James Carman wrote: >>> Yeah, you need to qualify names contributed in other modules. Prefix them >>> with the module id (and '.'). >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Johan Lindquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 10:41 AM >>> To: user@hivemind.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: MethodInterceptorFactory and multiple interceptors >>> >>> Somewhat simplified :) >>> >>> >>> <implementation service-id="com.acme.Service"> >>> <interceptor name="webservice1" after="jms1" >>> service-id="hivemind.lib.MethodInterceptorFactory"> >>> <impl object="service:WebServiceMethodInterceptor" /> >>> </interceptor> >>> </implementation> >>> >>> Also tried fully qualified: >>> >>> <implementation service-id="com.acme.Service"> >>> <interceptor name="webservice1" after="integration.jms.jms1" >>> service-id="hivemind.lib.MethodInterceptorFactory"> >>> <impl object="service:WebServiceMethodInterceptor" /> >>> </interceptor> >>> </implementation> >>> >>> Same error with both. >>> >>> Johan >>> >>> James Carman wrote: >>>>> What syntax are you using in the hivemodule-webservice.xml file? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Johan Lindquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 10:30 AM >>>>> To: user@hivemind.apache.org >>>>> Subject: Re: MethodInterceptorFactory and multiple interceptors >>>>> >>>>> Ok, i tried the name attribute - does this require a fully qualified >>>>> name or something? >>>>> >>>>> Currently getting the following error: >>>>> >>>>> 2006-07-19 16:28:21,919 ERROR com.acme.Service1 [error] Error at >>>>> >>> file:/home/johan/forge/projects/integration/target/test-classes/META-INF/hiv >>>>> emodule-webservice.xml, >>>>> line 61, column 121: Unknown interceptor contribution dependency >>>>> 'integration.jms.jms7' (for 'integration.webservice.webservice7'). >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> Johan >>>>> >>>>> James Carman wrote: >>>>>>> To be honest, that "name" attribute could be documented a bit better, >>>>>>> especially with respect to this factory. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: Johan Lindquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 10:19 AM >>>>>>> To: user@hivemind.apache.org >>>>>>> Subject: Re: MethodInterceptorFactory and multiple interceptors >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What happens if you contribute twice to the service point outside of the >>>>>>> service point definition? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Johan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> James Carman wrote: >>>>>>>>> In my test case for multiple method interceptors, I use multiple like >>>>>>> this: >>>>>>>>> <module id="hivemind.lib.test" version="1.0.0"> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <service-point id="FortuneCookie" >>>>>>>>> interface="org.apache.hivemind.lib.impl.FortuneCookie"> >>>>>>>>> <create-instance >>>>>>>>> class="org.apache.hivemind.lib.impl.FortuneCookieImpl"/> >>>>>>>>> <interceptor service-id="hivemind.lib.MethodInterceptorFactory" >>>>>>>>> name="first"> >>>>>>>>> <impl >>>>>>>>> object="instance:org.apache.hivemind.lib.impl.SuffixMethodInterceptor" >>>>> /> >>>>>>>>> </interceptor> >>>>>>>>> <interceptor service-id="hivemind.lib.MethodInterceptorFactory" >>>>>>>>> name="second"> >>>>>>>>> <impl >>>>>>>>> object="instance:org.apache.hivemind.lib.impl.SuffixMethodInterceptor" >>>>> /> >>>>>>>>> </interceptor> >>>>>>>>> </service-point> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> </module> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>> From: Johan Lindquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 9:22 AM >>>>>>>>> To: user@hivemind.apache.org >>>>>>>>> Subject: MethodInterceptorFactory and multiple interceptors >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have recently been using the MethodInterceptorFactory to create >>>>>>>>> interceptors based on the AOP Alliance libraries. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Now, it is all fine until I realised that I can not have two different >>>>>>>>> interceptors (using the MethodInterceptorFactory service id) added to >>>>>>>>> the same service point. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This would make sense if you for example referred to the logging >>>>>>>>> interceptor - two of it would be kinda dum. But since the >>>>>>>>> MethodInterceptorFactory is simply providing the plumbing for the real >>>>>>>>> implementation, 2 or more of this particular contribution should be >>> fine >>>>>>>>> right? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Not sure if this is an easy problem to solve or not? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> johan >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> you too? >>>>> -- >>>>> you too? >>> -- >>> you too? > > -- > you too? - -- you too? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEvksm1Tv8wj7aQ34RAo2kAJ0YV0ui2UXEB+E6Q+1S2+bEyhBJpQCgkRUN YK4SlsTYjkpP6XeLxCmcvbI= =aEjr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
