>then we can use `cache group` to share some backend data struct to gain some level performance. It will reduce the overhead for each cache since they will share the same data structures under the hood.
>Are there any potential issues or potential consideration need to be takecare of? Caches in one cache group should have the same data distribution configuration(affinity function, backups count, node filters). Evgenii вт, 13 нояб. 2018 г. в 6:39, kcheng.mvp <[email protected]>: > Thank you reply very much! > > If I keep all the caches for my system are created via sql, then all the > backend h2 tables are in public schema. > > in this case even all the caches are in the same schema but there are > different cache (one cache per table but all in the same schema) > > then we can use `cache group` to share some backend data struct to gain > some > level performance. > > > Are there any potential issues or potential consideration need to be take > care of? > > > right now we are doing production environment preparation. I know there are > must be new tables(caches) in the near future, but I want to keep all the > tables in the same database schema(just like traditional database such as > mysql) > > > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/ >
