I mixed up snapshot versions with beta-versions, sorry. I tried now the snapshot version and it works now as expected concerning the problem with the examples table.
Thank you! But there is a problem with comments. I will write a posting just on that. On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Mauro Talevi <mauro.tal...@aquilonia.org>wrote: > No, a new beta has not been deployed yet. In the meantime, you can use > the latest 3.9.x or build the 4.0 snapshot from source. > > On 8 May 2014, at 08:59, Hans Schwäbli <bugs.need.love....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Thank you! Is it also deployed? > I did not find it here: > https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/groups/public/org/jbehave/jbehave-core/4.0-beta-7/ > The last snapshot there is from 2nd of May. > The same snapshot date is on: > http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.jbehave/jbehave-maven-plugin/4.0-beta-7/ > > > On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Mauro Talevi > <mauro.tal...@aquilonia.org>wrote: > >> This issue is now fixed in head of 4.x branch. It did not apply to >> 3.x. >> >> >> On 07/05/2014 10:55, Hans Schwäbli wrote: >> >> I created such an example for jbehave-core now and attached it to this >> posting. I still cannot work on a clone the Github project because of >> company restrictions (I haven't yet received an answer why it is not >> working inside the company proxy). >> >> In case the mailing list does not support attachments I have also sent >> them directly to Mauro. >> >> To reproduce it you will need this in the Maven pom.xml: >> >> >> <metaFilters> >> >> <metaFilter>*+component order -skip*</metaFilter> >> >> </metaFilters> >> >> >> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Hans Schwäbli < >> bugs.need.love....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I committed it here: >>> https://github.com/OttoDiesel/jbehave-shop-example.git >>> >>> I will add such a scenario to the core examples. Until then you could >>> use that other example if you like. It is the example for the article on >>> JBehave by the way. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Mauro Talevi <mauro.tal...@aquilonia.org >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, it looks likely to be unrelated to given stories and such. >>>> >>>> Could you please add a scenario reproducing the behaviour to the >>>> meta_filtering.story in the core examples (preferably in English)? >>>> >>>> Does it work with 3.x? >>>> >>>> On 06/05/2014 11:34, Hans Schwäbli wrote: >>>> >>>> I already use StoryControls.doIgnoreMetaFiltersIfGivenStory(true). >>>> And I removed the given story in the story. >>>> >>>> But the result is the same. >>>> >>>> Maybe tomorrow I can commit the whole project, so that you can >>>> reproduce it. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Stephen de Vries >>>> <stephe...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 6 May 2014, at 10:51, Hans Schwäbli <bugs.need.love....@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I have the example story, see below. It runs not as expected when >>>>> filtering by: +Komponente Bestellung -Skip >>>>> >>>>> VorgegebeneStories: >>>>> shop/stories/Login.story >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> My guess is that the given story doesn’t have the same meta-tags. >>>>> Fix is to set: StoryControls.doIgnoreMetaFiltersIfGivenStory(true) >>>>> >>>>> See: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JBEHAVE-789 >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >> >> >> >
