Now, I am quite curious to know what is the exact change in 3.3 that is so resource effective :)
So, last time when we said we tested with 3.3, it was a miss from our side in our custom shell script where we were still using 3.0. Now, i have changed the version to actual 3.3 and tested. Seems like the CPU is much stable compared to that of 3.0 Test on 3.0 - CPU choking to max 32 core (that is the max i have on my machine) Test on 3.3 - CPU stays below 2 core Please do share the exact change that is implemented between 3.0 and 3.3 On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Can you take a thread dump ? > > Antonio > > 2017-10-20 11:34 GMT+02:00 Bincy P S <[email protected]>: > >> We have changed the JVM heap size to 2G , Jmeter version to 3.3 and tried >> these test runs . I still see the same issue >> >> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Philippe Mouawad < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> > What is the size of your JVM Heap ? If you didn't change it then it can >> > explain your issues. >> > Also why are you using an old version as 3.0, ? Last version is 3.3 ? >> > >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Bincy P S <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > > Jmeter Configuration : >> > > Thread setting : 1 thread , 5 transaction controller ,each with 1 HTTP >> > > sampler. Home Page, PLP,PDP ,AddtoCart,View Cart >> > > HTTP Request Sampler : tried with all Implementation,Download embedded >> > > resources - retrieve embedded resources, parallel download - 6 >> > > >> > > No other settings were changed >> > > >> > > jmeter version : 3.0 >> > > >> > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Philippe Mouawad < >> > > [email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hello, >> > > > What is your jmeter configuration ? >> > > > Did you change any setting ? >> > > > What is your jmeter version ? >> > > > >> > > > Thanks >> > > > Regards >> > > > >> > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Bincy P S <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > A load test with downloading just the HTML scales upto 300 users >> on >> > one >> > > > > Load generator (8 Core, 8 GB RAM - CPU at 20% max and Memory at >> 5%). >> > > > > However, when a similar profile is tested with download of >> non-HTML >> > > > > embedded resources (images, css, js, etc.,) along with HTML, the >> LG >> > > gets >> > > > > utilized to the max (100% CPU, Memory still at 20%) with just 30 >> > users. >> > > > > >> > > > > Testing the same profiles with Load Runner, there is not much >> > > difference >> > > > on >> > > > > LG performance between the 2 profiles >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > With Regards, >> > > > > >> > > > > Bincy Suresh >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Cordialement. >> > > > Philippe Mouawad. >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > With Regards, >> > > >> > > Bincy Suresh >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Cordialement. >> > Philippe Mouawad. >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> With Regards, >> >> Bincy Suresh >> > > -- *Ganesh .N* *Bangalore* *Wireless:* *+91 9611906678*
