Few http and few Https On Saturday, October 21, 2017, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected]> wrote:
> Was you me test using https ? > > > > On Friday, October 20, 2017, Ganesh Muralidhar <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > Our network switch is nothing less than 1GB and the testing is happening > > internal to the network. So no chance of network contention here. > > > > Secondly, after updating the JMeter version to 3.3 the CPU contention > seems > > not to be appearing again. Also, as Antonio mentioned, the below > mentioned > > bug fix sorted this. > > > > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59885 > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 9:42 PM, <[email protected] <javascript:;> > <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > > > Are you sure it's just CPU? It may be bandwidth for the network device > > > that is constrained - and the CPU is trying to figure out where to put > > all > > > the packets. > > > > > > Keep in mind, images (especially) are a lot of bytes worth of data. If > > > your HTML is 10K, but you download a relatively small banner image - > that > > > can be 100K of additional data (e.g., more than 10X the workload). Of > > > course that’s a lot more work for the system. A typical web page will > > have > > > 10-20KB of "skeleton" framework, but could have several megabytes of > > images > > > and non-HTML files. A multimedia page could have several times more of > > that > > > if you include streaming resources like movies or sounds. > > > > > > -- > > > Robin D. Wilson > > > Cell: 512-426-3929 > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Antonio Gomes Rodrigues [mailto:[email protected] <javascript:;> > <javascript:;>] > > > Sent: Oct 20, 2017 2:39 A > > > To: JMeter Users List <[email protected] <javascript:;> > <javascript:;>> > > > Cc: [email protected] <javascript:;> <javascript:;> > > > Subject: Re: Load Test with embedded resources chokes CPU > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Can you take a thread dump ? > > > > > > Antonio > > > > > > 2017-10-20 11:34 GMT+02:00 Bincy P S <[email protected] > <javascript:;> > > <javascript:;>>: > > > > > > > We have changed the JVM heap size to 2G , Jmeter version to 3.3 and > > tried > > > > these test runs . I still see the same issue > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Philippe Mouawad < > > > > [email protected] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > What is the size of your JVM Heap ? If you didn't change it then it > > can > > > > > explain your issues. > > > > > Also why are you using an old version as 3.0, ? Last version is > 3.3 ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Bincy P S <[email protected] > <javascript:;> > > <javascript:;>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Jmeter Configuration : > > > > > > Thread setting : 1 thread , 5 transaction controller ,each with 1 > > > HTTP > > > > > > sampler. Home Page, PLP,PDP ,AddtoCart,View Cart > > > > > > HTTP Request Sampler : tried with all Implementation,Download > > > embedded > > > > > > resources - retrieve embedded resources, parallel download - 6 > > > > > > > > > > > > No other settings were changed > > > > > > > > > > > > jmeter version : 3.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Philippe Mouawad < > > > > > > [email protected] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > What is your jmeter configuration ? > > > > > > > Did you change any setting ? > > > > > > > What is your jmeter version ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Bincy P S < > > [email protected] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A load test with downloading just the HTML scales upto 300 > > users > > > on > > > > > one > > > > > > > > Load generator (8 Core, 8 GB RAM - CPU at 20% max and Memory > at > > > > 5%). > > > > > > > > However, when a similar profile is tested with download of > > > non-HTML > > > > > > > > embedded resources (images, css, js, etc.,) along with HTML, > > the > > > LG > > > > > > gets > > > > > > > > utilized to the max (100% CPU, Memory still at 20%) with just > > 30 > > > > > users. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Testing the same profiles with Load Runner, there is not much > > > > > > difference > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > LG performance between the 2 profiles > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > With Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bincy Suresh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Cordialement. > > > > > > > Philippe Mouawad. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > With Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Bincy Suresh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Cordialement. > > > > > Philippe Mouawad. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > With Regards, > > > > > > > > Bincy Suresh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > *Ganesh .N* > > > > *Bangalore* > > > > *Wireless:* *+91 9611906678* > > > > > -- > Cordialement. > Philippe Mouawad. > -- *Ganesh .N* *Bangalore* *Wireless:* *+91 9611906678*
