Was you me test using https ?


On Friday, October 20, 2017, Ganesh Muralidhar <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Our network switch is nothing less than 1GB and the testing is happening
> internal to the network. So no chance of network contention here.
>
> Secondly, after updating the JMeter version to 3.3 the CPU contention seems
> not to be appearing again. Also, as Antonio mentioned, the below mentioned
> bug fix sorted this.
>
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59885
>
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 9:42 PM, <[email protected] <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > Are you sure it's just CPU? It may be bandwidth for the network device
> > that is constrained - and the CPU is trying to figure out where to put
> all
> > the packets.
> >
> > Keep in mind, images (especially) are a lot of bytes worth of data. If
> > your HTML is 10K, but you download a relatively small banner image - that
> > can be 100K of additional data (e.g., more than 10X the workload). Of
> > course that’s a lot more work for the system. A typical web page will
> have
> > 10-20KB of "skeleton" framework, but could have several megabytes of
> images
> > and non-HTML files. A multimedia page could have several times more of
> that
> > if you include streaming resources like movies or sounds.
> >
> > --
> > Robin D. Wilson
> > Cell: 512-426-3929
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Antonio Gomes Rodrigues [mailto:[email protected] <javascript:;>]
> > Sent: Oct 20, 2017 2:39 A
> > To: JMeter Users List <[email protected] <javascript:;>>
> > Cc: [email protected] <javascript:;>
> > Subject: Re: Load Test with embedded resources chokes CPU
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can you take a thread dump ?
> >
> > Antonio
> >
> > 2017-10-20 11:34 GMT+02:00 Bincy P S <[email protected]
> <javascript:;>>:
> >
> > > We have changed the JVM heap size to 2G , Jmeter version to 3.3 and
> tried
> > > these test runs . I still see the same issue
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
> > > [email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > > > What is the size of your JVM Heap ? If you didn't change it then it
> can
> > > > explain your issues.
> > > > Also why are you using an old version as 3.0, ? Last version is 3.3 ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Bincy P S <[email protected]
> <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Jmeter Configuration :
> > > > > Thread setting : 1 thread , 5 transaction controller ,each with 1
> > HTTP
> > > > > sampler. Home Page, PLP,PDP ,AddtoCart,View Cart
> > > > > HTTP Request Sampler : tried with all Implementation,Download
> > embedded
> > > > > resources - retrieve embedded resources, parallel download - 6
> > > > >
> > > > > No other settings were changed
> > > > >
> > > > > jmeter version : 3.0
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
> > > > > [email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > What is your jmeter configuration ?
> > > > > > Did you change any setting ?
> > > > > > What is your jmeter version ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > Regards
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Bincy P S <
> [email protected] <javascript:;>>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > A load test with downloading just the HTML scales upto 300
> users
> > on
> > > > one
> > > > > > > Load generator (8 Core, 8 GB RAM - CPU at 20% max and Memory at
> > > 5%).
> > > > > > > However, when a similar profile is tested with download of
> > non-HTML
> > > > > > > embedded resources (images, css, js, etc.,) along with HTML,
> the
> > LG
> > > > > gets
> > > > > > > utilized to the max (100% CPU, Memory still at 20%) with just
> 30
> > > > users.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Testing the same profiles with Load Runner, there is not much
> > > > > difference
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > > LG performance between the 2 profiles
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > With Regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Bincy Suresh
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Cordialement.
> > > > > > Philippe Mouawad.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > With Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Bincy Suresh
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Cordialement.
> > > > Philippe Mouawad.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > With Regards,
> > >
> > > Bincy Suresh
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> *Ganesh .N*
>
> *Bangalore*
>
> *Wireless:* *+91 9611906678*
>


-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.

Reply via email to