Hi all,
+1 to move the jakarta branch to JDK 21. Why: - Jakarta EE 11 targets Java 21; aligning reduces container friction. - Virtual threads are a clear win for our I/O-bound request model and simplify tuning. - Ongoing GC/runtime improvements in 21 over 17. On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 at 5:16 PM, Jürgen Weber <[email protected]> wrote: > What disadvantages come with 17-only? > > Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <[email protected]> schrieb am Fr., > 19. Sept. 2025, 11:01: > > > Hi Alex! > > > > IIRC, jakarta branch is still not merged, last commits from master > > must be carried over there, in order to bring the jakarta branch to > > master. After that, release should follow pretty soonish. I'll try to > > that between this weekend and the next, if no one else beats me to it. > > > > Also on the topic of JDK-17, given that latest LTS is now 25, should > > we ship the jakarta also with JDK-21 baseline? > > > > cheers, > > juan pablo > > > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 1:40 AM Alex O'Ree <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > Is there an ETA on a JDK17 compatible release? looks like the jakarta > > > branch was merged. that should pretty close to working on 17. > > >
