Question for the committers: would jspwiki 2.x continue to be supported, at least in the sense of getting bug fixes?
If not, I'd argue for a small update in the requirements, because users would essentially be forced to upgrade after the 3.0 release. A small step would make it easier for them. Ulf On Fri, 19 Sept 2025, 21:45 Alex O'Ree, <[email protected]> wrote: > My two cents, use the oldest possible jdk target and source versions that > can be supported. Something like a wiki isnoften bundled with other stuff > in tomcat and jumping too far might be too much. > > It's worth ensuring that it will run on newer jdks but running on olders > ones is still of value > > There's still tons of jdk8 apps out there. > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2025, 1:48 PM Arturo Bernal <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > +1 to move the jakarta branch to JDK 21. > > > > > > Why: > > > > > > - > > > > Jakarta EE 11 targets Java 21; aligning reduces container friction. > > - > > > > Virtual threads are a clear win for our I/O-bound request model and > > simplify tuning. > > - > > > > Ongoing GC/runtime improvements in 21 over 17. > > > > > > > > On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 at 5:16 PM, Jürgen Weber <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > What disadvantages come with 17-only? > > > > > > Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <[email protected]> schrieb am > Fr., > > > 19. Sept. 2025, 11:01: > > > > > > > Hi Alex! > > > > > > > > IIRC, jakarta branch is still not merged, last commits from master > > > > must be carried over there, in order to bring the jakarta branch to > > > > master. After that, release should follow pretty soonish. I'll try to > > > > that between this weekend and the next, if no one else beats me to > it. > > > > > > > > Also on the topic of JDK-17, given that latest LTS is now 25, should > > > > we ship the jakarta also with JDK-21 baseline? > > > > > > > > cheers, > > > > juan pablo > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 1:40 AM Alex O'Ree <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > > > Is there an ETA on a JDK17 compatible release? looks like the > jakarta > > > > > branch was merged. that should pretty close to working on 17. > > > > > > > > > >
