Hi!

finally the jakarta branch has landed on master :-) next stop add
JDK-17 support, and upgrade relevant libraries (selenide, lucene, the
Jenkinsfile, etc.).

Should not take too much to prepare an initial 3.0.0 release, so we
can focus on the post-javax world.

As for 2.x releases, I think we should answer there too to security
issues, at least for a while, so I've opened a 2.x branch for that. If
anyone wants to backport there features from 3.0.0, please feel free,
as for myself, I'll keep focus on 3.0.0 / security issues on 2.x,
can't spent much focus on 2.x these days.

cheers,
juan pablo

On Sat, Sep 20, 2025 at 10:45 AM Ulf Dittmer
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Question for the committers: would jspwiki 2.x continue to be supported, at
> least in the sense of getting bug fixes?
>
> If not, I'd argue for a small update in the requirements, because users
> would essentially be forced to upgrade after the 3.0 release. A small step
> would make it easier for them.
>
> Ulf
>
> On Fri, 19 Sept 2025, 21:45 Alex O'Ree, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > My two cents, use the oldest possible jdk target and source versions that
> > can be supported. Something like a wiki isnoften bundled with other stuff
> > in tomcat and jumping too far might be too much.
> >
> > It's worth ensuring that it will run on newer jdks but running on olders
> > ones is still of value
> >
> > There's still tons of jdk8 apps out there.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 19, 2025, 1:48 PM Arturo Bernal <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > >
> > > +1 to move the jakarta branch to JDK 21.
> > >
> > >
> > > Why:
> > >
> > >
> > >    -
> > >
> > >    Jakarta EE 11 targets Java 21; aligning reduces container friction.
> > >    -
> > >
> > >    Virtual threads are a clear win for our I/O-bound request model and
> > >    simplify tuning.
> > >    -
> > >
> > >    Ongoing GC/runtime improvements in 21 over 17.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 at 5:16 PM, Jürgen Weber <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > What disadvantages come with 17-only?
> > > >
> > > > Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <[email protected]> schrieb am
> > Fr.,
> > > > 19. Sept. 2025, 11:01:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Alex!
> > > > >
> > > > > IIRC, jakarta branch is still not merged, last commits from master
> > > > > must be carried over there, in order to bring the jakarta branch to
> > > > > master. After that, release should follow pretty soonish. I'll try to
> > > > > that between this weekend and the next, if no one else beats me to
> > it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Also on the topic of JDK-17, given that latest LTS is now 25, should
> > > > > we ship the jakarta also with JDK-21 baseline?
> > > > >
> > > > > cheers,
> > > > > juan pablo
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 1:40 AM Alex O'Ree <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is there an ETA on a JDK17 compatible release? looks like the
> > jakarta
> > > > > > branch was merged. that should pretty close to working on 17.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >

Reply via email to