Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
Andreas Hartmann wrote:
Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
Andreas Hartmann wrote:
Andreas Hartmann wrote:
[...]
- We could treat the site structure as a separate entity and apply
a workflow to it. This means that moving a document would be
an editing operation on the site structure, and you could
publish the site structure again. You could imagine the site
structure as a document which contains references to other
documents. Side note: Maybe it would be even appropriate to
implement it like this (this SimpleSiteManager is already
implemented this way).
There's problem with this approach:
If you move the documents A to A' and B to B', you can't publish
the change to A without publishing the change to B.
this is a non-issue imho. we can assume that the site admin thinks
before s/he types.
If you have a big site, and Alice moves A to A' (without publishing,
because her boss is on vacation), Bob couldn't move B to B' and
publish this without reverting Alice's changes ...
sitetree changes are admin tasks imnsho. it does not make sense to allow
editors to change the sitetree when they can't publish that change.
imnsho we don't need to yet another step to the publish workflow (create
doc -> edit in editor -> submit doc -> submit sitetree -> publish doc ->
publish sitetree). This type of sitetree (publish sitetree independent
from documents) could be accomplished as a custom doctype if desired.
--Doug
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
