Rainer Schöpf schrieb:
On Tue, 5 May 2009, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> Andreas Hartmann schrieb:
> > Hi Rainer,
> >
> > Rainer Schöpf schrieb:
> >
> > […]
> >
> > > Improve the TinyMCE integration by making tiny_valid_elements.js and the
> > > RelaxNG schema compatible (if possible).
> >
> > I guess this would affect the BXE integration, wouldn't it?
>
> Apart from that – I'm a little hesitant regarding schema changes in minor
> versions. What about existing content? Even if the schema is less strict than
> before, the resulting content might break existing applications.
Agreed.
Which reminds me of a question I've been meaning to ask for some time: the
xhtml.rng file includes xhtml-basic.rng, but has comments about changing this to
XHTML transitional or XHTML strict. Would that be an acceptable change?
Given my last statement, I'd have to say no :) But I think as long as we
stick to a standard, and old content remains editable, we could consider
changing the schema. IMO XHTML transitional is a bad compromise for a
content storage format, but AFAIK the default XHTML support of Firedocs
is targeted to the transitional schema, so maybe we'll have to switch to
this schema anyway when we want to support Firedocs.
WDOT?
-- Andreas
--
Andreas Hartmann, CTO
BeCompany GmbH
http://www.becompany.ch
Tel.: +41 (0) 43 818 57 01
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@lenya.apache.org
