2011/3/11 Massimo Lusetti <[email protected]> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Peter Neubauer > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Nice Ashwin, > > sounds like a great ac, will definitily keep track of it. If I do a > > Neo4j Index provider for JDBM2, would you be able to help me to tweak > > it to behave good? > > Did it really fail Lucene with big index? I got Lucene index with > millions of entries and it run smoothly... I'm talking of "pure" > Lucene's index not the Neo4j implementation. > > In fact I got issues with Lucene index within Neo4j and as soon as I > started to use an external managed index (Chenillekit Lucene module) I > got no issue with big index. >
> Curious about this thread. > And I'm curious about why the neo4j lucene layer adds overhead and how your code looks like in your own solution. > > Cheers > -- > Massimo > http://meridio.blogspot.com > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > -- Mattias Persson, [[email protected]] Hacker, Neo Technology www.neotechnology.com _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
