2011/3/11 Massimo Lusetti <mluse...@gmail.com> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Peter Neubauer > <peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com> wrote: > > > Nice Ashwin, > > sounds like a great ac, will definitily keep track of it. If I do a > > Neo4j Index provider for JDBM2, would you be able to help me to tweak > > it to behave good? > > Did it really fail Lucene with big index? I got Lucene index with > millions of entries and it run smoothly... I'm talking of "pure" > Lucene's index not the Neo4j implementation. > > In fact I got issues with Lucene index within Neo4j and as soon as I > started to use an external managed index (Chenillekit Lucene module) I > got no issue with big index. >
> Curious about this thread. > And I'm curious about why the neo4j lucene layer adds overhead and how your code looks like in your own solution. > > Cheers > -- > Massimo > http://meridio.blogspot.com > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > User@lists.neo4j.org > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > -- Mattias Persson, [matt...@neotechnology.com] Hacker, Neo Technology www.neotechnology.com _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
