On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Peter Neubauer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Let me know how it goes! Here are the results: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/22802242/neo4j-stats.ods As you can see JDBM is slower then Lucene in my tests and the growing trend in ms is steeper. Every rounds parse 200000 rows of my data, the data parsed is the same for both obviously. Let me know if you are interested in something more. -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
