2011/3/13 Massimo Lusetti <[email protected]> > On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Massimo Lusetti <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Peter Neubauer > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Let me know how it goes! > > > > Here are the results: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/22802242/neo4j-stats.ods > > > > As you can see JDBM is slower then Lucene in my tests and the growing > > trend in ms is steeper. > > > > Every rounds parse 200000 rows of my data, the data parsed is the same > > for both obviously. > > > > Let me know if you are interested in something more. > > BTW I've updated with some rounds using the internal neo4j index > framework, I've had to stop it sooner cause it would have taken too > much to complete. >
Hmm, that doesn't look very good. I'm very keen on looking at your code for this test, if possible, since I haven't experienced a slowdown like this before. I just did an insertion test of 1.5M indexed nodes and there was virtually no slowdown at all. > > Cheers > -- > Massimo > http://meridio.blogspot.com > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > -- Mattias Persson, [[email protected]] Hacker, Neo Technology www.neotechnology.com _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
