I've seen a few studies but nothing very complete. I'm no expert by far but the jest I got was that as of late 2010, OrientDB had really fast load/read times but that Neo4j was *far* better at graph transversal.
I am in the process of evaluating OrientDB from the perspective of "dense" graphs. I get the feeling at lot of performance is going to be dependent on the data model choosen for the particular platform. I welcome any Neo4j expert opinions on the matter though. Andrew On 07/10/2011 06:38 AM, Peter Neubauer wrote: > Hi there, > no, I have not seen anything that way, at least not relevant studies. > We have not seen any import over a couple of million records in > OrientDB sa far. > > Cheers, > > /peter neubauer > > GTalk: neubauer.peter > Skype peter.neubauer > Phone +46 704 106975 > LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer > Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer > > http://www.neo4j.org - Your high performance graph database. > http://startupbootcamp.org/ - Öresund - Innovation happens HERE. > http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party. > > > > On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Aliabbas Petiwala<[email protected]> > wrote: >> Is there any evaluation results and code availaible comparing neo with >> orientdb for very large graph databases? >> >> -- >> Aliabbas Petiwala >> M.Tech CSE >> _______________________________________________ >> Neo4j mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >> > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
