I think you should be easily able to write a generator and query use-cases from 
_your domain_.

And then use the code on orientdb and neo4j (native APIs) you might also use 
tinkerpop/gremlin but then you
have the indirection in betwee.

We can at least give you pointers for the neo4j code.

And your effort would be surely appreciated if published.

Cheers

Michael

Am 14.07.2011 um 21:30 schrieb Jacopo Farina:

> It would be very interesting to see a comparison.
> 
> The MVRB Tree (former RB+ Tree) used by OrientDB sounds amazing reading what
> they claim on the site, but I wasn't able to find any test except this one
> http://code.google.com/p/orient/wiki/DatabaseBenchmarks
> and I'm not able to fully compare them by myself.
> 
> Cheers,
> Jacopo Farina
> 
> 2011/7/11 Jacob Hansson <[email protected]>
> 
>> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Aliabbas <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> thanks andrew ! . Can you share with us your experiment for very large
>>> databases  . Orient db also claims to be highly scalable and follows a
>>> distributed model? How does that compare to neo4js scalability? Neo4j
>> seems
>>> to be more open and honest  than orient db in describing its limitations?
>>> 
>> 
>> As far as I can tell, the theoretical scalability and the distributed model
>> does not apply if you want to use the graphy features of OrientDB. At least
>> that's what it says on the OrientDB google code page. I do believe that
>> there is support for master/slave replication though, similar to the Neo4j
>> HA product.
>> 
>> If you have the time, I'd encourage you to try both databases out, and pick
>> whichever suits your needs. We are of course happy to answer any questions
>> about Neo4j that you have :)
>> 
>> Aliabbas Petiwala
>>> Composed on mobile n97mini
>>> 
>>> -original message-
>>> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j vs orient db
>>> From: Andrew White <[email protected]>
>>> Date: 10/07/2011 5:49 pm
>>> 
>>> I've seen a few studies but nothing very complete. I'm no expert by far
>>> but the jest I got was that as of late 2010, OrientDB had really fast
>>> load/read times but that Neo4j was *far* better at graph transversal.
>>> 
>>> I am in the process of evaluating OrientDB from the perspective of
>>> "dense" graphs. I get the feeling at lot of performance is going to be
>>> dependent on the data model choosen for the particular platform. I
>>> welcome any Neo4j expert opinions on the matter though.
>>> 
>>> Andrew
>>> 
>>> On 07/10/2011 06:38 AM, Peter Neubauer wrote:
>>>> Hi there,
>>>> no, I have not seen anything that way, at least not relevant studies.
>>>> We have not seen any import over a couple of million records in
>>>> OrientDB sa far.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> 
>>>> /peter neubauer
>>>> 
>>>> GTalk:      neubauer.peter
>>>> Skype       peter.neubauer
>>>> Phone       +46 704 106975
>>>> LinkedIn   http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
>>>> Twitter      http://twitter.com/peterneubauer
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.neo4j.org               - Your high performance graph
>>> database.
>>>> http://startupbootcamp.org/    - Ă–resund - Innovation happens HERE.
>>>> http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing
>> party.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Aliabbas Petiwala<
>> [email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> Is there any evaluation results and code availaible comparing neo with
>>>>> orientdb for very large graph databases?
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Aliabbas Petiwala
>>>>> M.Tech CSE
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Neo4j mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Neo4j mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Neo4j mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Neo4j mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Jacob Hansson
>> Phone: +46 (0) 763503395
>> Twitter: @jakewins
>> _______________________________________________
>> Neo4j mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Neo4j mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

_______________________________________________
Neo4j mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Reply via email to