niels, in this spike, I just concentrated on getting _something_ working in order to test insertion speed. This is not up to real indexing standards, so some love is needed here. I think Mattias is the best person to ask about pointers, let's wait until he is back next week if that is ok? Maybe some other (like the standard Lucene) index can suffice for the time being to test out things?
Cheers, /peter neubauer GTalk: neubauer.peter Skype peter.neubauer Phone +46 704 106975 LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer http://www.neo4j.org - Your high performance graph database. http://startupbootcamp.org/ - Öresund - Innovation happens HERE. http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party. On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Niels Hoogeveen <pd_aficion...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Trying to find something useful to hide the implementation book keeping of > Enhanced API, I tried out dbd-index as can be found > here:https://github.com/peterneubauer/bdb-index > It looks interesting, but fails its tests. When recovering it performs > BerkeleyDbCommand#readCommand from the log. The retrieved indexName is not > actually garbage. I would like to help make this component workable, but area > of the database is a bit beyond the scope that I know. > I know this is completely unsupported software, but can someone give me some > pointers on how to fix this issue? > Niels > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > User@lists.neo4j.org > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
