"When running the mvn install, both tests are ran after another." Since I didn't use mvn (xD) I ran the tests manually one by one, but what you say makes sense, it's likely the tests fail when ran one after the other, I'll see what happens with an @Suite since there are only 2 junit tests, with @Suite they work Let's see if I could run mvn install (btw, avoided mvn so far because I cannot install the git plugin for some reason and that other error I get) Looks like I still need to find out how to fix this error: [ERROR] The project org.neo4j:neo4j-berkeleydb-je-index:0.1-SNAPSHOT (E:\wrkspc\bdb-index-fork\pom.xml) has 1 error [ERROR] Non-resolvable parent POM: The repository system is offline but the artifact org.neo4j:parent-central:pom:18 is not available in the local repository. and 'parent.relativePath' points at wrong local POM @ line 3, column 11 -> [Help 2]
before I could do anything with maven... I'll skip trying to make maven to work for me for now, don't feel like it :) *I'm not qualified to fix this with maven, sorry* John On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Niels Hoogeveen <[email protected]>wrote: > > Hi John, > Thanks for looking into this. > I am still seeing the same error I had before. When running the mvn > install, both tests are ran after another. For some reason the transaction > log sees an unclean shutdown and tries to commit pending transactions. > During that process the index names of the bdb indexes are being retrieved > from binary storage. Here something goes wrong, because the index name > returned is garbage, so the recovery process fails because it can't find the > right index files. > Niels > > > Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 07:48:43 +0200 > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Neo4j] bdb-index > > > > I forked and "fixed", the tests are all working now: > > https://github.com/13th-floor/bdb-index > > Let me know if you want me to do a pull request, ... sadly I applied > > formatting on RawBDBSpeed and the diff doesn't look pretty if you're > trying > > to see what changed > > > > John. > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Niels Hoogeveen > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > Trying to find something useful to hide the implementation book keeping > of > > > Enhanced API, I tried out dbd-index as can be found here: > > > https://github.com/peterneubauer/bdb-index > > > It looks interesting, but fails its tests. When recovering it performs > > > BerkeleyDbCommand#readCommand from the log. The retrieved indexName is > not > > > actually garbage. I would like to help make this component workable, > but > > > area of the database is a bit beyond the scope that I know. > > > I know this is completely unsupported software, but can someone give me > > > some pointers on how to fix this issue? > > > Niels > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Neo4j mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Neo4j mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
